Comparison between Inorganic Geomimetic Chrysotile and Multiwalled Carbon Nanotubes in the Preparation of Onedimensional Conducting Polymer Nanocomposites 


Vol. 16,  No. 2, pp. 426-426, Feb.  2015


PDF
  Statistics
Cumulative Counts from November, 2022
Multiple requests among the same browser session are counted as one view. If you mouse over a chart, the values of data points will be shown.


  Cite this article

[IEEE Style]

F. Pierini, M. Lanzi, I. G. Lesci, N. Roveri, "Comparison between Inorganic Geomimetic Chrysotile and Multiwalled Carbon Nanotubes in the Preparation of Onedimensional Conducting Polymer Nanocomposites," Fibers and Polymers, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 426-426, 2015. DOI: fipo-2015-16-2-426.

[ACM Style]

Filippo Pierini, Massimiliano Lanzi, Isidoro Giorgio Lesci, and Norberto Roveri. 2015. Comparison between Inorganic Geomimetic Chrysotile and Multiwalled Carbon Nanotubes in the Preparation of Onedimensional Conducting Polymer Nanocomposites. Fibers and Polymers, 16, 2, (2015), 426-426. DOI: fipo-2015-16-2-426.