이형근, 주문호, 임지훈, 이중희, 김범중, 전기석, 심준식,

Vol. 34, No. 4, pp. 811-831, 8월. 2024
10.13089/JKIISC.2024.34.4.811, Full Text:
Keywords: Custody, Blockchain, DeFi, private key
Abstract

This paper has two main objectives. The primary objective is to conduct a comprehensive review of existing survey papers on the advantages, disadvantages, taxonomy, and technical vulnerabilities of cryptocurrency custody services. Additionally, we examined recent regulatory developments, the application of existing frameworks, conditions for performing custody services, and service providers' obligations. The secondary objective is to identify DeFi protocols in the regulatory 'grey area' and analyze their technical aspects and governance mechanisms. By synthesizing these findings, we propose guidelines for assessing DeFi decentralization and their potential for integration within the regulatory framework, providing insights for industry experts, regulators, and policymakers to balance industry needs with societal benefits.

Statistics
Cite this article