A Study on the Risk Reduction of Distribution Line through Analysis of Electric Shock Accident 


Vol. 33,  No. 2, pp. 13-20, Apr.  2018
10.14346/JKOSOS.2018.33.2.14


PDF
  Abstract

In this study, we analyze the current status of major disasters in distribution works and propose safety measures through the distribution live-line work method and electric shock risk assessment. The result of analyzing the ratio of electric shocks to the occurrence of industrial accidents in the recent 13 years shows that the death rate is higher than other industries, especially the construction industry occupying most of the disaster, and it is higher than the collapse disaster. We analyze statistic data of 101 victims selected as core words of live work, distribution line, pole and 22.9 kV in the investigation report of major accident of electric shock fatal from 2001 to 2014. The safety measure was established through the risk assessment of the distribution method using the standard model of the risk assessment based on the results of electric shock analysis on the distribution line. In order to prevent the electric shock accident which is recently being discussed, the risk assessment procedure were carried out in the above-mentioned 22.9kV special high voltage live-line operation method. We derived the risk reduction plan for the distribution line from the results of the major accidents statistic and demonstration of the line works.

  Statistics
Cumulative Counts from November, 2022
Multiple requests among the same browser session are counted as one view. If you mouse over a chart, the values of data points will be shown.


  Cite this article

[IEEE Style]

변정환 and 최상원, "A Study on the Risk Reduction of Distribution Line through Analysis of Electric Shock Accident," Journal of the Korean Society of Safety, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 13-20, 2018. DOI: 10.14346/JKOSOS.2018.33.2.14.

[ACM Style]

변정환 and 최상원. 2018. A Study on the Risk Reduction of Distribution Line through Analysis of Electric Shock Accident. Journal of the Korean Society of Safety, 33, 2, (2018), 13-20. DOI: 10.14346/JKOSOS.2018.33.2.14.