Measurement of Incident-reporting Rate for Developing a Leading Indicator of Safety Culture 


Vol. 33,  No. 6, pp. 93-101, Dec.  2018
10.14346/JKOSOS.2018.33.6.93


PDF
  Abstract

Various leading indicators of safety culture have been advocated for proactive actions as lagging indicators have limitations in reflecting the attitudes and behaviors due to their reactivity and low sensitivity. This study proposes a model of incident-reporting culture (IRC) and determines the influence of the components on incident-reporting rate (IRR) in order to develop proactive indicators of safety culture. A questionnaire survey was administered to 614 workers at a chemical company in Korea, and the internal psychological aspects were explored by using perceptions, attitude, and backgrounds. The relationship between these factors and IRR was quantitatively confirmed. The workers are more reluctant to report injury than property damage, the perception of severity is the most influencing factor, and most property damages are reported regardless of worker’s willingness. These features should be prioritized when improving IRC, and the criteria of IRC need to be aligned with safety culture.

  Statistics
Cumulative Counts from November, 2022
Multiple requests among the same browser session are counted as one view. If you mouse over a chart, the values of data points will be shown.


  Cite this article

[IEEE Style]

김범수, 진상은, 장성록, "Measurement of Incident-reporting Rate for Developing a Leading Indicator of Safety Culture," Journal of the Korean Society of Safety, vol. 33, no. 6, pp. 93-101, 2018. DOI: 10.14346/JKOSOS.2018.33.6.93.

[ACM Style]

김범수, 진상은, and 장성록. 2018. Measurement of Incident-reporting Rate for Developing a Leading Indicator of Safety Culture. Journal of the Korean Society of Safety, 33, 6, (2018), 93-101. DOI: 10.14346/JKOSOS.2018.33.6.93.

Search
(IN TITLE, AUTHOR, ABSTRACT,KEYWORDS)

Advanced Search ▼

POPULAR KEYWORDS
(TOP 10 KEYWORDS)

Recent Publications
(LAST 3 YEARS)

pISSN : 1229 - 9197
eISSN : 1875 - 0052

Impact Factor(2022): 2.5