Comparative Analysis of Foreign Armed Forces' Safety Management System for the Development of the R.O.K Defense Safety Management System 


Vol. 36,  No. 2, pp. 68-79, Apr.  2021
10.14346/JKOSOS.2021.36.2.68


PDF
  Abstract

Department of Defense, Republic of Korea has put in significant efforts towards safety over the years by developing defense safety management systems, such as establishing safety management organizations and enacting laws and regulations. Therefore, the number of casualties due to military activities has been reduced dramatically. However, many errors and problems are present in the safety management system (SMS) owing to a lack of proper SMS. That brings inefficiency and discontinuity in SMS. Hence, typical phenomena such as lack of safety management professionals and reactive safety management activities have not been properly corrected. This study reviews various academic papers on the SMS and research reports of major foreign institutions to redefine the concept and components of the defense safety management system to ultimately suggest improvement in the R.O.K defense safety management system. Additionally, the safety management system of the U.S. and British forces, considered to be the leading safety management system, were analyzed and compared to R.O.K defense SMS to derive their implications.

  Statistics
Cumulative Counts from November, 2022
Multiple requests among the same browser session are counted as one view. If you mouse over a chart, the values of data points will be shown.


  Cite this article

[IEEE Style]

안재현, 박찬영, 박상훈, 윤홍식, "Comparative Analysis of Foreign Armed Forces' Safety Management System for the Development of the R.O.K Defense Safety Management System," Journal of the Korean Society of Safety, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 68-79, 2021. DOI: 10.14346/JKOSOS.2021.36.2.68.

[ACM Style]

안재현, 박찬영, 박상훈, and 윤홍식. 2021. Comparative Analysis of Foreign Armed Forces' Safety Management System for the Development of the R.O.K Defense Safety Management System. Journal of the Korean Society of Safety, 36, 2, (2021), 68-79. DOI: 10.14346/JKOSOS.2021.36.2.68.